Title: A mixed methods longitudinal case study exploring the impact of a community-based, brief psychological intervention for men experiencing suicidal crisis. Authors/Creators: Dr Claire Hanlon (Orchid No. 0000-0003-2684-0123), Dr Jennifer Chopra (0000-0002-2144-4212) Jane Boland (No Orchid No.), Dr David McIlroy (Orchid No. 0000-0001-6502-2938), Professor Helen Poole (Orchid No. 0000-0002-6165-3764), Dr Pooja Saini (0000-0002-4981-7914). Affiliated Organisation: James’ Place Charity Rights Holder for Dataset: Claire Hanlon Year of Publication: 2024 Abstract Background: Suicide is a leading cause of death among men globally, highlighting the need for acceptable and efficacious suicide prevention. This study explored perceptions of the short- and long-term outcomes and acceptability of the James’ Place Model (JPM), a therapeutic intervention delivered within a community-setting for men experiencing suicidal crisis. Also, factors influencing engagement of suicidal men in research were explored. Materials and Methods: A mixed methods longitudinal case study design was used. Quantitative data was collated through baseline, 3- and 6-month follow up questionnaires distributed to 28 men receiving the JPM. Measures of resilience, hope, generalised self-efficacy, self-compassion, loneliness, perceived social support, entrapment, and the 10-item clinical outcome measure were taken, and merged with routine service data. Two semi-structured interviews informed development of case studies exploring men’s perceived acceptability and short- and long-term effectiveness of the JPM, and factors relating to suicide research engagement. Results: Descriptive analyses showed mean total scores of entrapment and self-compassion decreased and increased at 3-month follow-up respectively. Mean total scores of entrapment further decreased at 6-month follow-up, while mean scores of self-compassion remained similar to 3-month follow-up. Case studies highlight the perceived acceptability, and short- and long-term outcomes of the JPM suggesting use of the lay your cards on the table component help men to articulate the drivers of their suicidality. Men also discussed continued application of strategies developed during receipt of the JPM long-term including safety planning. Conclusion: JPM is perceived as acceptable among men experiencing suicidal crisis and future work should seek to determine whether its short-term efficacy is sustained long-term. Description * Provide a brief abstract or description of the dataset * Highlight key information such as data collection or generation methods, important characteristics, etc. * Specify how the dataset should be cited, including the format and any DOI if available. Include a citation for any publication related to the dataset or provide details if a publication is in progress. Contact details : C.A.Hanlon@ljmu.ac.uk or Dr Pooja Saini (P.Saini@ljmu.ac.uk) Terms of use To access the data : Please contact lst_research_support@ljmu.ac.uk to gain access to this dataset . Please tell us , why you want access, project you are working on if applicable , your name and institution , contact details . Project and funding information Title: A mixed methods longitudinal case study exploring the impact of a community-based, brief psychological intervention for men experiencing suicidal crisis. Project Start & End Dates: 1st December 2020 & 15th April 2022 Funder: N/A Contents Dataset Spss data file containing demographic data including IMD postcode deprivation category corresponding to high versus low IMD score, martial status and sexual orientation, precipitating and psychological variable data and total scores for all outcomes used within the study analyses. Methods Questionnaire data. Note, qualitative data is not available for this study due to ethical reasons. The data generated for the qualitative aspect of this work contains personal information of a sensitive nature and releasing this data would risk identification of study participants. Contents * List all files included in the dataset, along with their extensions and brief descriptions of their contents. If there are numerous files, provide a dataset structure key or file naming convention * If applicable, describe any specialised data file formats and specify the software used to generate or render the data files, including versions and relevant links Methods * Describe how the dataset was generated, including experimental procedures/protocols, environmental/experimental conditions, instruments used (hardware and software), data processing methods * Any information about data sources or individuals involved in the dataset creation or analysis. * If detailed methods are available in a published or forthcoming article, you can refer to it here and provide a brief citation. 2024