151 13 1176 4 3104 document 1176 DataFile diabetes risk perception data.sav application/octet-stream 46fc26895a83c929f218355dc8102b87 MD5 82370 2023-08-14 13:41:47 https://opendata.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/151/1/DataFile%20diabetes%20risk%20perception%20data.sav 151 1 1 application/octet-stream application/octet-stream en public cc_by_nd_4

DataFile diabetes risk perception data.sav

data Text 1177 5 3106 document 1177 Diabetes Risk Perception Dataset READMEFILE.docx application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document a3fdcba97fe98b670744c6c33242b9ac MD5 19509 2023-08-14 13:41:48 https://opendata.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/151/2/Diabetes%20Risk%20Perception%20Dataset%20READMEFILE.docx 151 2 2 application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document Readme file en public cc_by_nd_4

Diabetes Risk Perception Dataset READMEFILE.docx

readme Text 1178 1 3108 document 1178 indexcodes.txt text/x-pascal 418192d6a2718d1e94ba17a89b356f5d MD5 2234 2023-08-14 13:41:58 https://opendata.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/151/3/indexcodes.txt 151 3 3 text/x-pascal Generate index codes conversion from application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document to indexcodes en public

indexcodes.txt

http://eprints.org/relation/isVersionOf https://opendata.ljmu.ac.uk/id/document/1177 http://eprints.org/relation/isVolatileVersionOf https://opendata.ljmu.ac.uk/id/document/1177 http://eprints.org/relation/isIndexCodesVersionOf https://opendata.ljmu.ac.uk/id/document/1177 1179 3 3110 document 1179 diabetes risk perception dataset 15.8.23.xlsx application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet 330325b02b3c6057351a0f38bbc387c3 MD5 33337 2023-08-15 12:31:15 https://opendata.ljmu.ac.uk/id/eprint/151/4/diabetes%20risk%20perception%20dataset%2015.8.23.xlsx 151 4 4 application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet spreadsheet en public cc_by_nd_4

diabetes risk perception dataset 15.8.23.xlsx

data Dataset archive 7 disk0/00/00/01/51 2023-08-15 12:37:43 2024-03-12 17:35:27 2023-08-17 08:37:47 data_collection show 7 Newson Lisa 0000-0002-5874-8762 Umeh Frederick Vaja Ishfaq Abayomi Julie Patel Tasneem Rashidi Amineh psychology public dataset; diabetes; risk perception; ethnicity This data file provides raw data from a study conducted in the UK in person survey and online. 210 participants data is available. The study sort to assess participants actual (clinical) risk of developing type 2 diabetes compared to their perceived risk of developing type 2 diabetes. The study focused on understanding individual differences in risk perception, i.e. ethnicity. Measures : Demographic information included gender, age, sex, self-identified ethnic group and family history of diabetes. Risk Perception: Risk Perception (RP) was assessed using the validated Risk Perception Survey of Developing Diabetes (RPS-DD) questionnaire (Walker et al., 2003). The RPS-DD comprised 53 items, including five subscales: (a) Personal Disease Risk, (b) Comparative Environmental Health Risk, (c) Personal Control, (d) Optimistic Bias, and (e) Worry. A single item in the Personal Disease Risk scale measured the perceived risk for developing diabetes. The remaining items in this scale measured perceived risk to health of other chronic conditions. The Likert responses assigned numerical values from 1 to 4 for levels of perceived risk. “Almost No Risk”, “Slight Risk”, “Moderate Risk”, and “High Risk”. The scale was scored as the average of the items. A higher score refers to a higher perceived risk. Three subscales measure general attitudes that may modify risk perception for developing T2D: Personal Control subscale, Optimistic Bias subscale and Worry subscale. The Likert responses to these subscales, assigned numerical values from 1 to 4, are “Strongly Agree”, “Agree”, “Disagree”, and “Strongly Disagree”. Each subscale was scored as the average of the items, and a higher score was interpreted as a higher level of agreement for the assessed factor. A total risk perception score was calculated by adding each score for the subscales. 2023-08-14 published 10.24377/LJMU.d.00000151 Liverpool John Moores University Dr Lisa Newosn Liverpool John Moores University 4206 52 in person across Northwest England; online survey English English Ethical approval obtained for study. Removal of participant identifiers in dataset. 2018-04-01 2020-08-01 2023-08-14